Shuck and Jive


Saturday, January 14, 2012

Three Jesuses

During Thursdays With Jesus, we are reading Deepak Chopra's, The Third Jesus.   Join us Thursdays at 10:30.    I like Chopra's Jesus more than the "send you to hell" Jesus of default Christianity.   But Chopra's Jesus is kind of spooky.  Chopra talks about "God consciousness" and what all.   His Jesus is kind of a Hindu Jesus.    It is a good Jesus.  He is all about love and you can be like him.   But something isn't working for me.  It is the metaphysics that doesn't resonate.    Here are three theories.

1)  Orthodox Christianity.  After death we go to Heaven or Hell.   Jesus is the unique son of God who gets you to God and to heaven via grace (usually with some kind of action or belief on our part).  Salvation is "to love God and to enjoy God forever."

2)  Chopra.  Mind encompasses matter.  We are not our bodies.   We have bodies.  Jesus is enlightened being that we can become (presumably after enough reincarnations).   Salvation is becoming enlightened and developing "God consciousness."

3)  Naturalism.  No heaven.  No hell.  No reincarnation.  We are our bodies.  We do not exist outside of them.  Matter produces mind.   Consciousness arises from biology.  Jesus is a model of a life that matters.  Salvation is being at peace in one's own skin through life's contingencies. 

Personally, my religion is behind door number three.   But I don't insist.   Naturalism makes sense to me and I happen to like it.   I find happiness with it.  Which of the three makes you happy?   You can quibble with me that I didn't describe yours correctly.  Fine, describe it in a way that satisfies you.   But overall, how many choices really can there be?    Thoughts:
  • I think there are good people in each belief system.   
  • I don't think any view is worth freaking out and going to war over.   
  • I think this stuff is fun to talk about, but then I am just weird that way.
You might enjoy this debate between Leonard Mlodinow and Deepak Chopra, The War of Worldviews:  Exploring Science Vs. Spirituality.  

 

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Because I Know You Want Me to Do More Self-Promotion...

I post my first podcast of my new radio show, Religion For Life for you and your loved ones and for those who will inherit this mess we left them.  This is an interview with Anthony Flaccavento about building local, ecologically sustainable economies. 




You can hear and subscribe to podcasts by going here. I post them after they air on WETS and WEHC.    

This week catch my interview with local rabble rouser, Jennie Young, as she encourages us to take on the powers who want to destroy Tennessee's mountains.   Be sure to read this article Jennie wrote for the Elizabethton Star, Green Around the Hills, There's Nothing Like a Mountain.   


Sunday, January 08, 2012

Baptized With Spirit--A Sermon


Baptized With Spirit
John Shuck

First Presbyterian Church
Elizabethton, Tennessee

January 8th, 2012


 “Let me tell you this:  you’ll see the sky split open and God’s messengers 
ascending and descending on the Human One.”  
John 1:51 Scholars' Version


During the season of Winter we are going to explore the Gospel of John.     When the Jesus Seminar combed through the gospels to determine what sayings and deeds might have gone back to the historical person of Jesus and what were later traditions created by the gospel writers, they found virtually nothing in the Gospel of John that went back to the historical Jesus.    That can be deceptive.  That does not mean that John is not important.  It does not mean that John’s gospel did not capture the impulse or the spirit of the historical Jesus.  I think the gospel did do that in its own way.

In the synoptic gospels, Mark, Matthew, and Luke, Jesus speaks in parable and aphorism.  In John’s gospel Jesus speaks in long discourses.  In the synoptics, Jesus speaks about the “kingdom of God.”  In John, Jesus's favorite topic seems to be himself.   But that can be deceptive too.  It isn’t Jesus for the sake of Jesus, but as a human being that we all can become.


Jesus has a mystical quality in John.  He floats through reality.   It is as though he is saying to followers and opponents alike,

“You can’t touch this.”  
“You don’t crucify me.  I lay down my own life and take it up again.” 
“You are from below.  I am from above.” 
“I and the Father are one.” 
“Before Abraham was, I am.” 

 And, he promises his followers that they will soon see that,

“I am in the Father, and that you are in me and that I am in you.”

I think John is a fascinating and important gospel and with the assistance of biblical scholar Walter Wink, and particularly his book, The Human Being:  Jesus and the Enigma of the Son of the Man, we are going to explore what this gospel might say to us about what it means to be human.


The passage I read today concludes with a strange image:

“Let me tell you this:  you’ll see the sky split open and God’s messengers ascending and descending on the Human One.” 

Part of our exploration of John will be what the phrase translated here as the Human One means.   A more literal translation of the phrase in Greek is the awkward, “the son of the man.”  That is Jesus’ favorite title for himself.  Not messiah or christ, not son of god, not second person of the trinity, but “the son of the man.”   The human being.

That is the phrase that Wink discusses at length in his fascinating and important book, The Human Being:  Jesus and the Enigma of the Son of the Man.   Wink was a participant in the Jesus Seminar, although his conclusions directed him on a different path than that of the majority of the Fellows.   Wink writes in his book that the quest for the historical Jesus is more than an academic, historical study.  It was he says the search for the human Jesus.  That is for a Jesus who matters.   It is a search for a Jesus we can believe in.   The search is for the myth of the human.    

Wink sees in the phrase that Jesus used for himself more than any other, “the son of the man”, the archetypal human being.   That is the human being that we are invited and empowered to be.   Wink writes:

Lo, I tell you a mystery:
God is Human,
and we are to become,
like God.    P. 257

The Gospel of John is fiction.  The character Jesus in John is a product of the imagination of the author.   It is not made up of whole cloth, of course.    Somewhere in there was a real person who did and said things.   John’s Jesus is an interpretation, a parable, a presentation, or a symbolic representation.   

If what I just said sounds scandalous and heretical it is only because we have been bullied by the church and its dogmas, creeds, and theological sophistry.     Jesus is not the property of the church.   He is both a figure of history and a product of imaginative creation.     

The author of the Gospel of John wanted to show us something.  He saw in the person of Jesus something empowering.    He told a story of Jesus that made sense to him and that empowered him to embrace life and not be afraid of the powers of this world.  


Another important word for John is world or cosmos.    Depending on the context, it can mean earthly existence, life, or more often than not, it is a word for what Wink calls the “domination system.”    Jesus says, “I am not of this world.”  What does he mean?   I do not think he is saying that he is from another planet or from another place like heaven, or that he is of another spiritual incarnation or some spooky notion like that.   It means that he does not conform to the values of the dominant system.     What is this dominant system, this world?


Here is an illustration.  The late Thomas Berry, described the values of the domination system, what the Gospel of John calls world in two sentences.  

“The ideal is to take the greatest possible amount of natural resources, process these resources, put them through the consumer economy as quickly as possible, then on to the waste heap. This we consider as progress.”

I can’t think of a more succinct expression of “the world” than that.  Thomas Berry encapsulated the death and insanity of industrial civilization and its handmaiden, infinite economic growth, with those two sentences.  It is so true, I’ll read it again:

“The ideal is to take the greatest possible amount of natural resources, process these resources, put them through the consumer economy as quickly as possible, then on to the waste heap. This we consider as progress.”

You wonder why “the world” is blowing the tops off of mountains?   Over 500 in Appalachia so far and the Cumberlands in Tennessee are next.   If that isn’t enough, we will simply mine Canada and “process“ its tar sands.   It is a foreign country.  Nobody lives in Alberta.    Or we’ll frack the gas.   Don’t worry about what it might do to the water.   Gas is more important than water anyway, right?   If that isn’t enough to live up to our ideals, we can start a skirmish with another middle eastern country in hopes that that will somehow keep the oil flowing.  

The "world" has to live its ideal.  In the "world", you are not a human being.  You are a consumer.  You role is to consume everything in sight until Earth is a wasteland.    That is normal.  That is progress.  That is the domination system.  That is what the author of John’s gospel calls “the world”.    Obviously, in John’s time and in Jesus’s time, they weren’t talking about modern industrial civilization, but they were talking about the unsustainable dominant civilization of its time, one whose mode of operation was to divide, destroy, conquer and grow.  

Lest there be any doubt, when I care about Jesus or about the Gospel of John it is not because I care about heaven or hell or reincarnation or resurrected corpses or supernaturalism or any of that stuff.  I think all of that is a distortion of the original impulse of Jesus and of those who caught what he was saying and doing.   We have literalized first century symbolism and thus distorted it.

The historical Jesus and the imaginative creation by John’s Gospel  is an invitation and an exhortation to respond to the "world" by becoming a human being.     I don’t want to be anything less or more than a human being.    Being a human being means that we expose the values of “this world” for what they are—death values.     


I respect everyone's freedom to explore their religion.  My personal religion is Earth-based.  I am an Earthling.   I am a human being.   From Earth I was born and to Earth I shall return.  If by chance, I am completely wrong and the whole point of this exercise of life was to get to heaven or to be reincarnated, then at my death, I will say to whatever supernatural magician who offers these prizes the following:

“No thank you.  I have lived my life.  There is nothing more I need.   You can have your afterlife. I don’t want it.   Instead, if you have the power, provide for my children and their children and the creatures of Earth.  Give them a chance to live on Earth.   Can you make it so the waters will be pure, and the mountains covered with trees?”   

To me, religion is about being a human being.  It is about living a life that matters.    

We are going to be ordaining elders and deacons later in the service.  We will ask of them to say, “Yes” to a number of questions.    Those questions for me, at least, need to be interpreted.    I see them as the willingness to honor and to wrestle with the tradition and to serve with integrity.    One of the questions I don’t have to reinterpret in my mind when I say, “Yes” that I can regard at face value is this one:

“Will you pray for and seek to serve the people with energy, intelligence, imagination, and love?”

Where do I wish to put my energy, intelligence, imagination, and love?  Is it for an afterlife?  Do I want to live for that?  Not me.   I would argue that neither Jesus nor the gospel writers were about that either.     No, my energy, intelligence, imagination, and love needs to be at the service of life on Earth as it is and for our children that they may have the opportunity to breathe clean air, grow and eat healthy food, and drink clean water.   

Part of saying “Yes” to our descendants and saying “Yes” to Earth is to say “No” to “the world” and its values of domination.   The issue I have with much contemporary spirituality is that it allows us to escape into spiritualism rather than to be baptized by Spirit.     

John the Baptist says that Jesus is the one to baptize by Spirit.   He is the one who shows us what it means to be a human being.    Being a human being requires us to stand up and to resist the powers.    The promise of John’s gospel is that we can do it.    

Jesus says to Nathaniel, you think the parlor trick, the little psychic trick of me seeing you under the tree was interesting?  You ain’t seen nothing yet.       

“Let me tell you this:  you’ll see the sky split open and God’s messengers ascending and descending on the Human One.”

That is symbolic language of course.  It has to do with the dignity of humanity.   Human beings are not slaves, or cogs on an assembly line, or consumers, or cannon fodder.     

And you stop being those things when you start being a human being now.   

When we wake up and when we stand up and when we speak up for the dignity of life we become transcendent.    The angels ascend and descend upon us.


To recap and conclude with something to take home:

The Gospel of John’s Jesus is a human being.  He is the archetype of Human Being.  He is the Human One.   The Human One is who we really are as opposed to what “the world” or the domination system says we are.   This is not spiritually spooky stuff nor is it elitist.  It is for anyone.   We can all be human in our own contexts.    It requires the choice on our end to decide to live a life that matters.    

A life that matters is not big, or is it the same as someone else.   A life that matters is saying,

I matter. 
I don’t matter more than anyone else or any less.  
I count. 
I am not a consumer. 
I am not a cog on the industrial gear. 
I am not collateral damage. 
I am not a problem to be solved. 
I am not who “the world” says I am.
I am a human being.  
I am creative. 
I can live with intention and with integrity.  
I choose to be compassionate. 
I choose to be happy.
I choose to be hopeful.
I can find a way to bring compassion, joy, and hope, into my life and into the lives of others.  
I can care about something. 
I want Earth to be here for my descendants.
I can fight for it. 
I can expose the lies of the powers and speak my truth. 
I am baptized by Spirit.
I am a human being.
We human beings can start a revolution.
We human beings can change this world.
Amen.

Friday, January 06, 2012

Faithful Resistance to Mountain Top Removal Mining on the Next Religion For Life

500 mountains in Appalachia have had their tops destroyed in order to get to the coal seams. Many within faith communities see this destruction as an assault on God's creation. Coal companies have their sites set on Tennessee's mountains. 

Jennie Young of Elizabethton, Tennessee talks to me on Religion For Life about efforts to alert people, particularly in faith communities, about mountain top removal strip mining, and to encourage them to tell our political representatives to take action. 

Jennie Young was featured in the Elizabethon Star, Struggle to Protect State's Mountains is a Moral Issue at Heart for Activist 

 

Jennie Young and others from First Presbyterian Church of Elizabethton speaking out for Appalachia's mountains. 

Updated Schedule for Religion For Life

Here is the schedule for Religion For Life. New programs will be aired in this order:
  • Thursdays 8 p.m. WETS, 89.5
  • Sundays noon. WEHC, 90.7
  • Sundays 2 p.m. WETS, 89.5
  • Mondays 1 p.m. WEHC, 90.7
You can listen via live streaming to all the broadcasts on both stations.
After the show has been broadcast the four times, podcasts will be available. Please subscribe!
Be well!

Thursday, January 05, 2012

Religion For Life Begins Tonight

My radio show, Religion For Life, starts tonight.  My guest will be Anthony Flaccavento of S.C.A.L.E. regarding building local, sustainable economies. 

The program starts at 8 pm (Eastern Time) on WETS, 89.5.  You can listen via live stream anywhere in the country. 
  • So if you are in Winthrop, Washington tune in at 5 p.m.  
  • If you live in Twodot, Montana, you'll hear Religion For Life at 6 p.m.  
  • If you hang your hat in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, it will be 7 p.m. 
  • and if you live Soddy Daisy, Tennessee catch Religion For Life at 8 p.m. 
  • The Pope in Rome will tune in at 2 a.m. 
  • and folks in Auckland, New Zealand will enjoy Religion For Life with their morning tea at 8 a.m.   
No matter where you are, we have you covered via live streaming. 

The program will be rebroadcast on Sunday at 2 p.m. (Eastern) WETS and Monday at 1 p.m. on WEHC, also available via internet live streaming.     

Follow Religion For Life on Twitter and Facebook too!


Tuesday, January 03, 2012

Presbyterians, Evolution, and Darwinmas

I have been elected to be a delegate for the 2012 General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)  I have never been a delegate before so I am looking forward to the week in Pittsburgh this summer.   One of my hopes for the General Assembly is that they will endorse the Clergy Letter Project like the United Methodist Church has done. 

It is too late to send an overture to General Assembly from my presbytery as we will not meet again until March and it will miss the deadline.  My questions to my Presby friends are these:
  • Has any presbytery submitted an overture affirming the Clergy Letter Project?
  • If not, do you know of any plans to do so?
  • Still no?  Anyone game to work with me on getting this going?
Meanwhile, I hope that you have Darwinmas on your liturgical calendar. Evolution Weekend is February 10-12. I hope it is a sacred time for you as it is for me. And may you experience the joy of natural selection not just during one weekend but the whole year long.

Presbyterians Profit from Israeli Occupation

This is a well-written and accurate letter in the Layman by Will McGarvey regarding Alan Wisdom's attack on the stated clerk of the PC(USA). 
I see that Alan Wisdom is up to his old tricks again (“GA set to tangle again over Israel divestment” 12-15-11). For anyone who has followed church discussions and policies on our hope for a just peace between Israelis and Palestinians for any amount of time, to read Wisdom’s latest piece, is an insult to our faith and intelligence.

Since 1967, when Israel invaded and occupied the West Bank and Gaza and began colonizing those territories with permanent settlements and economic controls against international law, it has been the policy of the PCUSA’s predecessor bodies and our church today to stand by our Christian partners in the region who were displaced and forced off their land. Wisdom doesn’t use the term “occupation” once in his own narrative, but only includes the term so crucial to understanding what is going on in the quotations of those he is attacking. The corporations that MRTI has finally voted to divest from are profiting from the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands. Their products are being used to destroy Palestinian homes, olive orchards, roads and build walls between these same peoples and their farmlands and orchards, while allowing an occupying army to regularly invade Palestinian controlled areas and detain or jail Palestinians without habeus corpus rights. The whole point of a “phased-selective divestment” process was to study who was profiting from the dispossession of those in the West Bank and Gaza so as not to do so any longer. It took less than 12 months for the PCUSA to divest from Talisman Oil in Sudan when they were profiting from the selling of oil futures to the government of Sudan to buy armaments to be used against their own people. Why is it so hard for us to stop profiting from the occupation of Palestine? MRTI has resisted taking a stand since 2004, and now that corporate engagement has proven ineffectual in between four General Assemblies, they cannot pretend that another chance exists that appealing to these corporations will change their behavior. They have proven that we need to add them to the list of those we would rather not invest in – or be in open contempt of our own policies of socially responsible investment.

We are a denomination whose Scriptures call us to the ways of Jesus of Nazareth, who resisted the Roman occupation of Jewish lands in his own day. Our own confessions compel us to be reconcilers, not appeasers, to the injustice we see in our own day. And yet Wisdom, and others have succumbed to a form of Christian Zionism that doesn’t know how to question the harmful actions that the state of Israel continues to enact against the Christians and Muslims in Palestine. There is not an “anti-Israel alliance” in the PCUSA. Pretending that the stated clerk does anything but express the policies of the General Assembly is more than an ad hominem attack, it is slander. To me, Wisdom owes Parsons a public apology.

What this article points out is that there is a growing pro-peace, justice movement of members, ruling elders and teaching elders who have studied this issue, and who hold to our constitutional forms of mission, action and solidarity – even with that slim minority of Palestinian Christians who continue to live out their faith in the cradle of Christianity. That Wisdom and his organization is so quick to work against their survival is its own testament to his position and work.

Rev. Will McGarvey, pastor currently serving Community Presbyterian Church of Pittsburg, Calif.

Sunday, January 01, 2012

The Way, the Truth, and the Life--A Sermon

The Way, the Truth, and the Life
John Shuck

First Presbyterian Church
Elizabethton, Tennessee

New Year’s Day 2012
John 14:1-31

I am excited about my new radio program, Religion For Life, that begins airing this Thursday.   I have recorded and produced several interviews already.   Anthony Flaccavento is this week’s guest and then our own Jennie Young will be on the following week talking about mountain top removal strip mining as a moral issue.   

This past week I interviewed Carol Delaney, professor emerita at Stanford.  She is now a research scholar at Brown.  I used her book Abraham on Trial as a resource for my series of sermons on Genesis.  Her latest book is about Columbus.    It is called Columbus and The Quest for Jerusalem

Do you know why Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 14 hundred 92?

It wasn’t to prove the world was round.
That was common knowledge already.

It wasn’t to be greedy or imperialistic. 
Nor was it a matter of curiosity.

It was because of religion. 

He wanted to get to China to get gold and spices, not just for the sake of gold and spices, but to fund something else.  He needed to get enough capital to fund a crusade to take Jerusalem from the Muslims.   Why? 

Only when Jerusalem was in Christian hands could the temple could be rebuilt.  Then the stage would be set for Christ’s return.    Columbus saw himself as part of a divine plan to wrap up the end of time for Jesus. Lest anyone think that religion is not a powerful motivator look to Christopher  “Christ-bearer” Columbus.

Columbus was not unusual.   He was unusually bright, gifted, and creative.  His beliefs were not unusual.  He was devout.  He acted on his beliefs.   His beliefs would have been common for the medieval period.    In his world, there was one true faith.  Muslims, Jews, and other sects were mistaken, wrong, and false.  Religious diversity was not a value or even a possibility.

Columbus and those of his time saw Earth as the center of the universe.  The sun, moon, stars moved around it.   Christ, the Father, and Spirit, sat on the heavenly thrones just  beyond these heavenly bodies.   The universe wasn’t particularly old, 6,000 years or so and it would end, Columbus believed, less than 200 years from his own time.  He had calculated the end for himself by reading the Bible.  

Changes were happening around them and Columbus saw these events as signs of the end.  The clock was ticking and the faithful had work to do.  They needed to prepare Earth for Christ’s return.  That meant making sure that the false believers were not in control of the holiest of places, Jerusalem.   Columbus wanted to finance a holy quest, a holy war, to take back Jerusalem.   That is why the rhyme tells us:

He had three ships and left from Spain;
He sailed through sunshine, wind and rain.

Why tell this business about Columbus?  In part, because I want you to listen to the radio program when it airs.    I also want to illustrate how foreign his world is from ours.   That foreign aspect is not just in terms of technology, that we have fancier ships and google maps. 

His world is different from ours on multiple and significant levels.  When you enter his world both in terms of time, space, and theology, you can see how his views at least fit his universe.    His view of Earth was small, contained in time and space and central to existence and human beings were the apex of creation.

For us, Earth is not the center of the universe.  It is a pale blue dot in the suburbs of a galaxy that is one of billions of galaxies.    The universe is 14 billion years old.    Homo sapiens are so late to arrive it is difficult to plot our arrival on the time scale.    The universe will do its thing billions of years after the last of the homo sapiens has breathed her last.   There is no “end”, certainly in human time.     

In terms of the time and space of what we even know of the universe, we are a speck of sand on a beach.    Human beings are evolved not created and not above but related to all other forms of life.    We are only beginning to imagine what “meaning” is in that universe.  We need to catch up with the universe as we discover it and explore ways of creating meaning in it.

Columbus’s theology, philosophy, and motivation are not possible today, except in the minds of the deluded and there are plenty of those.     It is a good thing that the majority of us do not embrace his world-view.  Imagine starting a holy war to win back Jerusalem from the Muslims so that Jesus will return.   How insane is that?  The insanity is that there are people who still believe that today.    We do not want those people to have access to weapons of mass destruction.

Columbus is 500 years before us.  If his world is foreign to us, go back another 1400 years to the Gospel of John.     Yet there is less difference, far less difference, in terms of world-view between the time of Jesus and the time of Columbus than the time of Columbus and our time.   

The modern symbol of Columbus, imperialism and genocide, is a myth.   As professor Delaney discovered from her research, the historical Columbus was actually a devout, good person.   His beliefs were not unusual for his time.  They were just really wrong.   It didn’t happen.   It is important to state that obvious point.   The purpose, the goal, the whole reason for his voyage never came true.  He never started a Crusade and Jesus didn’t return.    He was wrong.  History took a different turn.

Here we sit in church reading a text 1900 years old that was written by people who had a view of the world far closer to that of Columbus than us.    A text in which Jesus says,

“I am the way, the truth, and the life…no one gets to the Father unless it is through me.”

And he says,

“If I go to prepare a place for you, I’ll return and embrace you, so where I am you can be too.”

Columbus read that same text.  He thought it meant that Christ and Christendom is the only way and the goal is getting to the place that Christ prepared, a new Earth that will be created by Christ who is now in heaven just above the stars.    Christ will return, destroy the old Earth and make a new Earth.    That is what Columbus thought.  Columbus was wrong.

He wasn’t the only one wrong about that.   The Apostle Paul was wrong.  As was John the Baptist.  While there is debate regarding the historical Jesus, as to what he thought, it is possible that he thought he lived in the end times too, and if so, he was wrong.   A plethora of prophets predicting the end of days since then all have one thing in common.  They were wrong.  The guy who predicted the rapture this past May and again in October, was wrong.  Those who want to search the mysteries of the Mayan calendar and predict that “the end” will occur on 12/12/12 or 12/21/12 or whenever, will be, you guessed it, wrong. 

What is the point of these sacred texts if reading them leads us to do some really strange things?  Things that are wrong and potentially harmful?   If you really believe the end of the world is coming, what is your ethic?  Columbus’ ethic was crusade and holy war.    I am going to go out on a limb and say that is not good. 

If you are still searching for a New Year’s resolution, I will offer an option:  resolve not to believe wrong things.  Even if, especially if, these wrong things are shrouded in sacred tradition and holy hoopla.   Be blasphemous.   Blasphemy may be the only thing that will save us from those who think they are divinely inspired to start holy wars.

This season is the via creativa, the spiritual path of creativity and imagination.   I do think that we need creativity and imagination to face the task before us as human beings at the start of 2012.   One of the tasks is to create meaning and to find a goal, a reason, and a purpose.  

Columbus and medieval Christendom lived in a world of meaning and purpose.   It was wrong, but cozy.   Our challenge is more difficult in some respects.  Our world is not cozy and tidy in terms of time and space.   How do we live in a universe that will exist long after we as individuals and as a species are gone?  How do we live accepting that we are not the center or the goal of the universe?    Our religious traditions don’t prepare us for those questions.   

Columbus had a grand scheme.  He thought he was part of a divine plan to end the world.  

  • What if we lived as though we were not part of a grand plan but rather something quite other entirely?   
  • What if we trusted the truth that we are the eyes, ears, and voice of the universe right now, in our own way? 
  • What if we valued our purpose on on that scale?    
  • What would happiness, peace, justice, and contentment look like if our god was a god of small things?    
  • What if our goal was not to end the world or to live forever on a new Earth, but to be authentically human in this one?    
  • What if our purpose was to be comfortable in our own skin? 

I think that Jesus was much smaller than the tradition wanted him to be.  The Gospel of John said that his smallness was cosmic.   I read this gospel as an invitation to be real and present to life as it comes to us.    The disciples want “the Father.”  They want the big deal.  Jesus says you have seen the Father when you see me.   

I don’t think the historical Jesus said that, that is John’s creation, however, the point is that it is in the historical person of Jesus and in his life in the present that we see the Father.  That is what the author of John's gospel saw in Jesus.    It is in the everyday doing and being that we find the holy.    For Jesus, it was a life of compassion for others, for himself, and a profound respect for life.     

His purpose was to love.

If you are like me at all, you spend more time thinking about what will happen or might happen or what has happened than about what is happening.   We might spend a lot of time judging our past and our future.     We over-think things.  We allow our emotions to control us and that can tend to make us anxious about life.    The truth is that while we have thoughts and while we have emotions we are not those things.  We can step back and be conscious of them.

So when Jesus says he is the way, the truth, and the life, I see it as an invitation to live here and now with awareness.    The only way to be authentically here and human is to be here.   

And the place that "he has prepared for us" is right here and now 
when we give ourselves permission and time to be here and now 
and to accept who we are here and now 
and to love ourselves here and now 
as we are here and now.  
There is nothing else we have to be.
Nothing else we have to do.

I said that a possible New Year’s resolution is to resolve not to believe wrong things.

A second one is to believe something about yourself that I think is right.

You have been thrown into this world, now, in this time, for a purpose.

That purpose is to love.
Love yourself.
Love others.
Love life.
Love this moment.
Love it all.

Amen.

Saturday, December 31, 2011

Blessings at Year's End

This is from Howard Thurman.  I post it for you on this last day of 2011. 


Blessings At Year's End

I remember with gratitude the fruits of the labors of others, which I have shared as a part of the normal experience of daily living.

I remember the beautiful things that I have seen, heard, and felt—some, as a result of definite seeking on my part, and many that came unheralded into my path, warming my heart and rejoicing my spirit.

I remember the new people I have met, from whom I have caught glimpses of the meaning of my own life and the true character of human dignity.

I remember the dreams that haunted me during the year, keeping me ever mindful of goals and hopes which I did not realize, but from which I drew inspiration to sustain my life and keep steady my purposes.

I remember the awareness of the spirit of God that sought me out in my aloneness and gave to me a sense of assurance that undercut my despair and confirmed my life with new courage and abiding hope.