This should be my last, last post.
I have created a new website that will host sermons, radio show information and podcasts, and more.
Are you ready?
Religion For Life.
Visit often!
Shuck and Jive
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Wednesday, November 07, 2012
Last Post
For everything, there is a season.
The season has changed for Shuck and Jive.
I am ending this blog.
It is funny how changes come about. I have been blogging at "Shuck and Jive" for over six years and on the domain shuckandjive [dot] org since September 22, 2008. I have been wanting to change the tone and focus for some time, especially since Zach's death. I really don't feel "shuck and jivey" anymore.
I was talking about this with my office assistant, Sandra Garrett, and she noted that as it is with many decisions, sometimes they are made for you. While on vacation visiting my parents this past week, I happened to check my blog on my mother's computer and saw that my blog was gone. The domain had been parked at Godaddy with a price of $8,800 and I was not the owner.
At first I thought I had been hacked, especially since my blog has had increased attention thanks to Sarah Palin's comment about President Obama doing the "shuck and jive." My blog received a lot of traffic for that!
Finally, today, after going over my records and calling Godaddy, I have put together what happened. For the past several years, Googleapps has contacted me via email and reminded me to update. I have dutifully done so. Ten bucks each year. I was careless with it. I only renewed when reminded. This year I received no reminders and no notifications about renewing or its possible expiration. None. My contact information did not change. Same email for the past five years. Being preoccupied with other matters this summer, I didn't even think about it.
I told the Godaddy flunkie over the phone that I received no notification about my blog renewal, expiration, or eventual loss and he said it isn't their fault. They send email reminders as a courtesy but perhaps they were lost in my spam folder? They weren't. In either case, he told me that I let it expire and someone else owns it now, but wouldn't I like to purchase another domain?
No thanks.
There is no way to contact Googleapps. There is not a human being among all of that electronic hullaballoo.
There is no foul play. But it certainly is convenient for the purchaser of shuckandjive [dot] org that for $10 or so s/he purchased a domain worth $8,800 and Godaddy and Google will receive commissions and fees on managing it.
Learn from me, dear bloggers. If you have a domain, pay attention to it.
The money isn't the issue. I have lost nothing. I refused advertising and made no revenue off my blog. I certainly had no idea what this domain was worth due to the traffic my blog has steadily received over the years. It is however terribly inconvenient as all the links all over the web to my blog are to shuckandjive [dot] org. The current owner will make money whenever anyone goes there. None of those links will go to anything I have written.
I have temporarily put "Shuck and Jive" on blogspot and will keep it here until I decide what to do with it.
In the meantime, I am retiring the phrase, "shuck and jive" as it applies to me.
And that is OK. I don't feel quite as edgy anymore. I would like to publish longer pieces for someone somewhere, maybe a column once per week. I may tie it in with my radio show, Religion For Life, which you can find at www.religionforlife.me.
I will resurrect and I will let you know where to find me!
Thanks, my friends, for your readership over the years.
It has been fun!
The season has changed for Shuck and Jive.
I am ending this blog.
It is funny how changes come about. I have been blogging at "Shuck and Jive" for over six years and on the domain shuckandjive [dot] org since September 22, 2008. I have been wanting to change the tone and focus for some time, especially since Zach's death. I really don't feel "shuck and jivey" anymore.
I was talking about this with my office assistant, Sandra Garrett, and she noted that as it is with many decisions, sometimes they are made for you. While on vacation visiting my parents this past week, I happened to check my blog on my mother's computer and saw that my blog was gone. The domain had been parked at Godaddy with a price of $8,800 and I was not the owner.
At first I thought I had been hacked, especially since my blog has had increased attention thanks to Sarah Palin's comment about President Obama doing the "shuck and jive." My blog received a lot of traffic for that!
Finally, today, after going over my records and calling Godaddy, I have put together what happened. For the past several years, Googleapps has contacted me via email and reminded me to update. I have dutifully done so. Ten bucks each year. I was careless with it. I only renewed when reminded. This year I received no reminders and no notifications about renewing or its possible expiration. None. My contact information did not change. Same email for the past five years. Being preoccupied with other matters this summer, I didn't even think about it.
I told the Godaddy flunkie over the phone that I received no notification about my blog renewal, expiration, or eventual loss and he said it isn't their fault. They send email reminders as a courtesy but perhaps they were lost in my spam folder? They weren't. In either case, he told me that I let it expire and someone else owns it now, but wouldn't I like to purchase another domain?
No thanks.
There is no way to contact Googleapps. There is not a human being among all of that electronic hullaballoo.
There is no foul play. But it certainly is convenient for the purchaser of shuckandjive [dot] org that for $10 or so s/he purchased a domain worth $8,800 and Godaddy and Google will receive commissions and fees on managing it.
Learn from me, dear bloggers. If you have a domain, pay attention to it.
The money isn't the issue. I have lost nothing. I refused advertising and made no revenue off my blog. I certainly had no idea what this domain was worth due to the traffic my blog has steadily received over the years. It is however terribly inconvenient as all the links all over the web to my blog are to shuckandjive [dot] org. The current owner will make money whenever anyone goes there. None of those links will go to anything I have written.
I have temporarily put "Shuck and Jive" on blogspot and will keep it here until I decide what to do with it.
In the meantime, I am retiring the phrase, "shuck and jive" as it applies to me.
And that is OK. I don't feel quite as edgy anymore. I would like to publish longer pieces for someone somewhere, maybe a column once per week. I may tie it in with my radio show, Religion For Life, which you can find at www.religionforlife.me.
I will resurrect and I will let you know where to find me!
Thanks, my friends, for your readership over the years.
It has been fun!
Monday, October 29, 2012
Jonathan Haidt, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, on Religion For Life, November 1-5
Jonathan Haidt, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Haidt's newest book is about one of the hottest topics in the sciences - morality. It’s about how we evolved to live in moral “matrices,” which bind us together around sacred values and then blind us to the truth. It’s about righteousness, moral diversity, politics and religion.
Thursday, November 1st at 8 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Sunday, November 4th at noon on WEHC, 90.7.
Sunday, November 4th at 2 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Monday, November 5th at 1 pm on WEHC, 90.7.
Via podcast beginning November 6th.
Thursday, November 1st at 8 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Sunday, November 4th at noon on WEHC, 90.7.
Sunday, November 4th at 2 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Monday, November 5th at 1 pm on WEHC, 90.7.
Via podcast beginning November 6th.
Labels:
jonathan haidt,
religion for life
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Be Not Afraid of the Dark--A Sermon
Be Not Afraid of the Dark
John Shuck
First Presbyterian Church
Elizabethton, Tennessee
October 28, 2012
All Saints
Have you entered into the springs
of the sea,
or walked in the recesses of the deep?
Have the gates of death been
revealed to you,
or have you seen the gates of deep darkness?
Job 38:16-17
Are You Afraid of the Dark? was a television show in the 90s that
my kids watched. It was a kids’ show on the Nickelodeon
channel. The set up for the show was a group of teenagers, “the midnight society”
telling scary stories around a fire at night. Each
of the characters told different stories and the stories reflected their
personalities. The message in that is
that each of us has our unique dark side.
We are all struggle with and in
the dark in our own way. I think
another message of the show was that you gain courage to face the dark when you
share your stories with others.
The dark is a fearsome
place. You don’t know what might jump
out at you in the dark. As a child I
remember that scary moment between turning off the light in the bedroom and
running for the bed to get undercover as soon as possible. Apparently, I was safe in the bed from
whatever dark creatures lurked about in my room. As
long as you get undercover, you are OK.
Last week we explored
the metaphor of silence. This week
darkness. Both silence and darkness point toward the
spiritual path of via negativa. We tend to think darkness is a bad thing. Even the Gospel of John that we read at Christmas sees darkness as something
that wants to get you and take you over.
The promise is this:
The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.
True enough. But darkness is also a path. For those acquainted with the night, they
know, like Robert Frost, that this acquaintance is "neither wrong nor
right." There
is something to be learned in the dark. Poets, the strong ones, the ones we read, have
dabbled in the dark. I think
it takes courage to be acquainted with the night and to spend time in
darkness.
In the darkness we keep
the things that we don’t want everyone to know. That is anyone to know, including
ourselves. The darkness hides our
vulnerability. Jung called this aspect of ourselves the
shadow side or the dark side. We prefer to keep that side hidden. We create elaborate masks to wear in order to
show the world that we are people of the light, happy and together and above
average.
The via negativa invites us to explore the
dark places. The truth is that if you
don’t find what is in the dark, what is in the dark will eventually find you. One of my favorite sayings of Jesus is from
the Gospel of Thomas, which is itself
a gospel that had been hidden in the darkness, literally in clay pots for 1700
years. In this hidden, secret gospel we
find this from Jesus:
"If you bring forth what is within you, what you have will save you. If you do not bring it forth, what you do not have within you will kill you."
Every hero must go into the dark. The great myths of the hero’s quest to slay dragons, find the holy grail, battle
Voldemort, rescue the ring, face crucifixion and so on are about entering the
dark and discovering the courage to take on what you find.
The via negativa is not about defeating what
is in the dark. It could be that, but it
is also about embracing what is in the dark.
In the dark is a treasure. That
treasure is an aspect of our own self.
The path invites us to find that and bring it into the light where it
can be embraced and admired by all.
This is the sense of
the passage in the Gospel of John. The light shines in the darkness not to
obliterate the darkness but so it can bring to light what has been hidden
there. When it is hidden we are overwhelmed,
saddened, and dis-eased. When brought
to the light it is becomes a source of strength, joy, and healing. That is the point of the path.
So God asks Job:
Have you entered into the springs of the sea,or walked in the recesses of the deep?Have the gates of death been revealed to you,or have you seen the gates of deep darkness?
The story of Job is the textbook for the via negativa.
There is a lot to say
about Job, that I am not going to say
today. It is enough to know that the
character “God” does not come off well.
He and his drinking buddy, Satan, have a spitting contest about who is
tougher and Job ends up being the object of this wager. God lets Satan torture Job to prove that Job
will be loyal to God no matter how he suffers.
Job is not in on this
little game. Neither of course are Job’s friends. But we are.
Job rejects all of his friends’ theories as to why this might be
happening to him. Job is right even
though he doesn’t know why he is right.
The reason Job suffers is because “God” behaves pathologically.
We are not supposed to
say that because we are pious. We have been taught that the Bible is God’s Word
and that God is good. When we read the
Bible we are told that no matter how barbaric God appears God must be
right. The price we pay for piety is
that we put halos around bad texts and endorse harmful ethics.
Once you get over that
notion that the character “God’ in the Bible is always good, in fact, far from
it, then you can appreciate the story of Job.
God never comes clean
to Job. He never tells him the truth. He never says,
“Hey Job, buddy. The reason you were suffering is because, well Satan and I had a little bet about you. I hope you aren’t sore. And hey, you helped me win. You were loyal to the end! What do you say, still friends?”
God says none of
that. Nor does God apologize for his ruthless behavior. Instead God conjures up an
impressive hurricane and speaks to Job from a position of power. He goes on for several chapters about how
tough he is. He can drag around
Leviathan with a fishhook. He made the
heavens and the mountains. He tells Job in effect:
What have you done, little man? How dare you question me!
That’s God’s
answer. Might makes right. In that speech from the whirlwind, God says
to Job:
Have you entered into the springs of the sea,or walked in the recesses of the deep?Have the gates of death been revealed to you,or have you seen the gates of deep darkness?
Those are rhetorical
questions to which Job must only answer, No.
No he has not physically entered the place below the flat earth where
the water comes up. Nor has he entered physically
the gates to the underworld.
But, of course, we know that Job truly has seen the gates of
death, the gates of deep darkness. He
has walked the recesses of the deep. He
has done so in the most real way possible.
He has suffered. He lost
everything and he has not given up in his quest to find meaning. He has not given in to simplistic answers
that are not true even as they might comfort.
These primitive notions
of God that are still prevalent today were inadequate to help the author of Job
make sense of life. Job is the story of
what happens when one’s religion is too small for life. Job represents the true hero. In addition to refusing the easy answers of
orthodoxy that his friends thrust on him, he faces the foundation of meaning
itself. He faces God, or the best
understanding of God that he can imagine.
He finds God wanting.
I am not sure if the
author of the story of Job knew what he was doing. His story of Job seems to me to be a
deconstruction of monotheism. God may
be all good or all powerful but he can’t be both. In Job’s story, he comes across as only
powerful and not good.
This is the translation
of that pivotal passage in chapter 42 in which Job supposedly repents. According to the excellent book, God: A Biography by Jack Miles, that is a mistranslation. It is garbled Hebrew that translators
misused to make Job the bad guy. According to piety, God can’t be wrong, so Job must repent. This is the NRSV translation:
Then Job answered the Lord:
‘I know that you can do all things,
and that no purpose of yours
can be thwarted.
“Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?”
Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand,
things too wonderful for me,
which I did not know.
“Hear, and I will speak;
I will question you, and you
declare to me.”
I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear,
but now my eye sees you;
therefore I despise myself,
and repent in dust and ashes.’
That is the pious
interpretation. But that is inconsistent. We all know that Job
has nothing for which to repent. God is
the one who needs to repent. This translation
from Jack Miles is, I think, more accurate.
These are Job’s final words to God after God delivers his blustery speech:
Then Job answered the Lord:
You know you can do anything.
You know you can do anything.
Nothing can stop you.
You ask, “Who is this ignorant muddler?”
Well, I said more than I knew, wonders quite beyond me.
“You listen, and I’ll talk, “ you say,
“I’ll question you, and you tell me.”
Word of you had reached my ears,
But now that my eyes have seen you,
I shudder with sorrow for mortal clay.
The story of Job is the
textbook for the via negativa.
The author of Job is
showing that the God they had inherited is all power and no love. All power and no goodness. It took a courageous author to create a
courageous character to expose this idea of God as inadequate for meaning. That opened the way for a fuller sense of God to develop.
Job is a model of a
spiritual hero. His is a model for
today, for the searcher, who is not satisfied with the pious explanations that
hold no water, and who will search out in the dark places for a more fulfilling
answer.
Job is a hero who is not afraid of the dark.
Amen.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Four Months
Tomorrow is the 28th of the month. It has been four months since Zach took his life on June 28th. Tomorrow is All Saints' Sunday. Or maybe it is the next Sunday. In either case, we will honor the saints tomorrow. In church we will pass the microphone around the sanctuary so people can name those who have died this past year and we will ring the singing bowl when each name is mentioned.
In the afternoon, Lovely, Daughter, and I will sprinkle some of his ashes around a tree planted in his memory at Holston Camp. Then on Monday I leave for Montana to visit my parents and extended family. I haven't seen my parents since Zach died. And yes, I will take the bus. It's what I do.
I have been reading, My Son, My Son: A Guide to Healing After Death, Loss, or Suicide by Iris Bolton. She lost her son to suicide. She was a counselor at a counseling center, "The Link." A couple of board members had said after her son's death:
Iris Bolton faces the goblins and continues as a counselor. She writes:
It isn't even so much "the job" as it is the existential feeling of failing. I failed to give my son whatever it was he needed to keep going. I also know that I did what I could given my human fallibility. I know that if I were responsible for this death it wouldn't have happened. But I don't know if that feeling of failure will ever go away.
In the afternoon, Lovely, Daughter, and I will sprinkle some of his ashes around a tree planted in his memory at Holston Camp. Then on Monday I leave for Montana to visit my parents and extended family. I haven't seen my parents since Zach died. And yes, I will take the bus. It's what I do.
I have been reading, My Son, My Son: A Guide to Healing After Death, Loss, or Suicide by Iris Bolton. She lost her son to suicide. She was a counselor at a counseling center, "The Link." A couple of board members had said after her son's death:
"If she couldn't help her own son, how can she expect to help anyone else?"She goes on to say:
The funny thing is that I agreed. So paralyzing is the combination of depression, guilt, and shock, that its victim is mentally reduced to a jackstraw, a hollow man, a cipher. p. 36I know that feeling. How could/can I be a minister, preaching, teaching, and counseling when I failed my most important assignment? Who in their right minds would listen to anything I have to say when in my primary role as a father I delivered to the world a corpse rather than a living, productive man?
Iris Bolton faces the goblins and continues as a counselor. She writes:
Some persons had declared openly that The Link was finished if I were to return. But we continued to be busy. Parents began to refer teenagers to me for help in preventing their suicides, and I was overwhelmed with the wonder of it. How could they think that I might help them when I had failed to save my own son? I was in awe of what seemed to be a miracle. More than anything else, it helped me to begin to find some meaning in the meaninglessness of Mitch's death. p. 40At some point she decided to disagree with the voices outside (and more importantly inside) of her that said she was a failure. She stuck it out. I hope I can be that strong.
It isn't even so much "the job" as it is the existential feeling of failing. I failed to give my son whatever it was he needed to keep going. I also know that I did what I could given my human fallibility. I know that if I were responsible for this death it wouldn't have happened. But I don't know if that feeling of failure will ever go away.
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Thanks, Sarah Palin, for the Shuck and Jive!
Thanks to Sarah Palin accusing the president of doing the "Shuck and Jive" everyone has been coming to my blog to see what the "shuck and jive" is!
Awesome and welcome!
If you want to know what shuck and jive is, well, it is me!
I am John Shuck and I have been doing the shuck and jive on this here blog for over six years. Busybodies, fusspots, tattletales, and scolds have been trying to get rid of me for years for being a heretic and a wolf in sheep's clothing and whatever else. I just keep doing the shuck and jive and I keep smiling.
I shuck and jive about religion, politics, war and peace, equality, and lightening up.
I even shuck and jive on my radio program, Religion For Life. Check it out!
Again welcome to all of you searching for the authentic shuck and jive. You have found it! Stick around!
Awesome and welcome!
If you want to know what shuck and jive is, well, it is me!
I am John Shuck and I have been doing the shuck and jive on this here blog for over six years. Busybodies, fusspots, tattletales, and scolds have been trying to get rid of me for years for being a heretic and a wolf in sheep's clothing and whatever else. I just keep doing the shuck and jive and I keep smiling.
I shuck and jive about religion, politics, war and peace, equality, and lightening up.
I even shuck and jive on my radio program, Religion For Life. Check it out!
Again welcome to all of you searching for the authentic shuck and jive. You have found it! Stick around!
Labels:
religion for life,
sarah palin,
shuck and jive
Monday, October 22, 2012
Autumn Leaves
One of our church members, Samantha, was a camper when Zach was a counselor at Holston Camp in 2006. She shared this pic of Zach helping out one of the campers. He was really good with them. I wondered if he might have gone into some kind of work with kids.
Lovely, Daughter, and I returned from vacation Saturday night. We found the leaves had changed and already are falling.
It may be a long winter.
Hospital Chaplains for Pastoral Care Week on Religion For Life, October 25-29
Debbie Shields, Kathy Haga and Ellie Novak-Scoffield, are hospital chaplains for the Mountain States Health Alliance. They speak about the important healing work of hospital chaplains for Pastoral Care Week. Pastoral Care Week gives opportunities for organizations and institutions of all kinds and types to recognize the spiritual caregivers in their midst and the ministry which the caregivers provide.
Thursday, October 25th at 8 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Sunday, October 28th at noon on WEHC, 90.7.
Sunday, October 28th at 2 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Monday, October 29th at 1 pm on WEHC, 90.7.
Via podcast beginning October 30th.
Thursday, October 25th at 8 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Sunday, October 28th at noon on WEHC, 90.7.
Sunday, October 28th at 2 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Monday, October 29th at 1 pm on WEHC, 90.7.
Via podcast beginning October 30th.
Sunday, October 21, 2012
The Sound of Silence--A Sermon
The Sound of Silence
John Shuck
First Presbyterian Church
Elizabethton, Tennessee
October 21, 2012
For God alone my soul waits in silence,
for my hope is from him.
He alone is my rock and my salvation,
my fortress; I shall not be shaken.
On God rests my deliverance and my honour;
my mighty rock, my refuge is in God.
Trust in him at all times, O people;
pour out your heart before him;
God is a refuge for us.
Psalm 62:5-8
We returned last night from our vacation. Bev, Katy, and I went on a cruise. A Carnival Cruise on the cruise ship, Imagination. It left Miami stopped at Key West and then at the island of Cozumel where we took a ferry boat and bus to visit the Mayan ruins at Tulum on the Yucatan Penisula. I hadn’t been on a cruise before and it was as they bill it, “fun”!
Fun means they fill your senses with music, food, drink, dance, and entertainment, non-stop. This is about fun and getting out and being out in the sunshine. There are precious few moments for silence. You can hide in your cabin, I suppose, but that defeats the point.
This cruise is the exact opposite of a retreat to a monastery. Not that one is better or more holy or sacred or whatever. A Carnival Cruise and a Benedictine Monastery would represent two different paths. One would be the via positiva with the explosion of images and sounds, the other the via negativa with a silencing of all images.
The cruise ship was fun and good for us. I would do it again. You need a little positiva now and then.
This Fall we are exploring the via negativa as a spiritual path. This is the path of letting go and letting be. This is the path in which a metaphor is silence. The via negativa is not to be equated with suffering or bad things. It isn’t about being “negative.” On the other hand, loss and suffering can be invitations to find spiritual meaning on this path.
If the via positiva is about filling up with images, the via negativa is about emptying out.
For example, in speaking about God, if the via positiva says
everything is God,
the rainbow is God,
the sunshine, the clouds, the trees, you, me.
God is out there.
God is in here.
The stars are the face of God; beauty is God.
Or God is found through this creed or this system of doctrine.
This set of beliefs point to God.
Or I see God everywhere.
I hear God everywhere.
I feel God everywhere.
That is the via positiva.
That is a good thing.
God is a Carnival Cruise ship.
It is constructive theology.
The via positiva is about saying what God is.
The via negativa acknowledges the God constructed by the via positiva and says in addition to all of that Yes, God is also No.
God is not a rainbow, sunshine, clouds, trees, you, and me.
God is not out there.
God is not in here.
The stars are not the face of God.
God is not exclusive to this creed or that system of doctrine or those beliefs.
The sights are I see are not God.
The sounds I hear are not God. My feelings are not of God.
I feel no thing, not even God.
That is the via negativa.
This is the path of letting go even of God in order for God to be.
We might call it deconstructive theology.
An image for this is from 1 Kings 19. Elijah is in a cave. He is frightened. He is alone. People are trying to kill him. He hears the word of the Lord, who tells Elijah:
‘Go out and stand on the mountain before the Lord, for the Lord is about to pass by.’ Now there was a great wind, so strong that it was splitting mountains and breaking rocks in pieces before the Lord, but the Lord was not in the wind; and after the wind an earthquake, but the Lord was not in the earthquake; and after the earthquake a fire, but the Lord was not in the fire; and after the fire a sound of sheer silence.
Then the Lord comes to speak to Elijah.
The storyteller has captured the via negativa.
The sound of sheer silence.
Have you ever heard the sound of sheer silence?
That is the sound you hear when the foundations that have held you have been shaken. When the beliefs you inherited are like a bowl that is filled with holes and it holds no water. It is the sound of your experience of life being too real for your religion. When your religion becomes too small to hold your life, your spiritual path is the via negativa.
It doesn’t matter what religion or philosophy, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Atheist even. You notice it when you begin to struggle with the tradition and with others and finally with yourself. It is an exciting if unnerving, perhaps even frightening, and possibly lonely path. It is a path that many resist because it requires that “you walk the lonesome valley by yourself.” It is a path that calls you to say ‘No’ to the tribe. When the tribe or its spokesperson says this is what we believe and you say well…maybe not me, you are on the via negativa.
You may not know what it is you can affirm. You have to stay with that. The via negativa invites you to stay with that not knowing, with that uncertainty, with that letting go and not knowing if there is anything, but trusting that that is the path to take. It is the way of silence.
From Matthew Fox, Original Blessing:
The need for silence that Zen speaks of, that wisdom literature celebrates, that Eckhart praises, and that Merton calls for is not just about oral silence. Silence means the letting go of all images—whether oral ones or auditory ones or visual ones or inner ones or cognitive ones or imaginative ones. Whether of time or of space, of inner or of outer. It is a radical letting go of language. A letting language go. A concentration on what is non-language, non-music, non-self, non-God. It is being. A being still. Eckhart puts it this way:
One should love God mindlessly, without mind or mental activities or images or representations. Bare your soul of all mind and stay there without mind. Pp. 136-137
How do you do that? How do you let go?
At times our life situations are invitations to this path. We may be on it whether we want to be or not. The challenge then is not to try to fill it with noise too soon. Suffering and loss alone is not the path. They can be invitations to the path. We have to be with the loss. Honor it. Honor the silence that comes with it.
Every week in worship we do something counter-cultural. We have an extended moment of silence during our time of meditation. It can be discomfiting. We are not used to periods of silence, especially in a group setting. Someone needs to entertain us, do something, say something, show us something. Meditation invites us to sink into the very moment we are actually in. As opposed to thoughts ahead or thoughts behind, we are invited to be with ourselves. Silence is that vehicle.
The via negativa or the way of silence is also an opportunity to be honest with ourselves about our doubts, our own alienation, our vulnerability and our struggle.
I want to read to you a section from the Big Book of Alcoholics Anonymous. It is an introduction to the Twelve Steps. You may say, "I don’t need that. I am not an alcoholic." That’s fine. I don't insist. But you may find it resonates.
I think it captures the essence of the via negativa, the spiritual path of letting go and letting be…
Rarely have we seen a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path. Those who do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves to this simple program, usually men and women who are constitutionally incapable of being honest with themselves. There are such unfortunates. They are not at fault; they seem to have been born that way. They are naturally incapable of grasping and developing a manner of living which demands rigorous honesty. Their chances are less than average. There are those, too, who suffer from grave emotional and mental disorders, but many of them do recover if they have the capacity to be honest.
Our stories disclose in a general way what we used to be like, what happened, and what we are like now. If you have decided you want what we have and are willing to go to any length to get it – then you are ready to take certain steps.
At some of these we balked. We thought we could find an easier, softer way, but we could not. With all the earnestness at our command, we beg of you to be fearless and thorough from the start. Some of us have tried to hold on to our old ideas and the result was nil until we let go absolutely.
Remember that we deal with alcohol – cunning, baffling, powerful! Without help it is too much for us. But there is One who has all power – that one is God. May you find Him now!
Half measures availed us nothing. We stood at the turning point. We asked His protection and care with complete abandon.
Here are the steps we took, which are suggested as a program of recovery….
The book goes on to list the twelve steps. This Twelve Step program, developed in the 1930s has been adopted by and adapted to fit other programs of recovery. In many respects, it is a good spiritual path for anyone. It is a path of rigorous honesty. That is the heart of the via negativa.
After the 12 steps, the Big Book continues:
Many of us exclaimed, "What an order! I can't go through with it." Do not be discouraged. No one among us has been able to maintain anything like perfect adherence to these principles. We are not saints. The point is that we are willing to grow along spiritual lines. The principles we have set down are guides to progress. We claim spiritual progress rather than spiritual perfection.
The via negativa is a spiritual path. It is a path in which the emphasis is on progress not perfection.
It is a path that begins with the sound of sheer silence.
It is a path of
willingness to wait,
to be,
to enter the silence,
to be honest with who you are and where you have been,
and to let that self be embraced,
and loved.
Amen.
Labels:
AA,
Big Book,
fall 2012,
sermon,
via negativa
Friday, October 12, 2012
Eugenie Scott of the National Center for Science Education, Oct. 11-15 on Religion For Life!
Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education will be in Nashville October 27th. The title of her presentation is "Why the Tennessee Academic Freedom Act Matters to YOU." She is my guest on Religion For Life to discuss this legislation, offer history and insights to the evolution/creationism controversy, and promote the teaching of science.
Listen via livestream…
Thursday, October 18th at 8 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Sunday, October 21st at noon on WEHC, 90.7.
Sunday, October 21st at 2 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Monday, October 22nd at 1 pm on WEHC, 90.7.
Via podcast beginning October 23rd.
Listen via livestream…
Thursday, October 18th at 8 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Sunday, October 21st at noon on WEHC, 90.7.
Sunday, October 21st at 2 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Monday, October 22nd at 1 pm on WEHC, 90.7.
Via podcast beginning October 23rd.
I Am Spartacus and Brian!
It takes so long for these cases to go through the Presbyterian court system that I forget about them. The LayMAN never forgets. They linked today to this article in the Christian Post, PCUSA's Highest Commission to Hear Case of Lesbian Clergy Who Married Her Partner. I have written about this case before and here.
She was taken to church court for getting legally married. The busybodies said that is bad, against the Bible, and so on. The presbytery pjc said it was fine. She was acquitted. The busybodies appealed. How does that happen, by the way? I'm no lawyer but isn't that double jeopardy? I guess with church court we should be lucky they don't determine justice by filling our pockets with rocks and throwing us in the water to see if we float.
Anyway, the synod pjc said not guilty. The busybodies decided to keep trying and now she is before the General Assembly PJC. We will find out next week.
In the meantime, Laurie and Lisa have already been married for three years.
In the meantime, it is time for all good clergy to obey their ordination vows and sign this statement that you have and/or will marry same-gender couples and not only to sign the statement, but if given the opportunity, seize the day!
In the meantime, Landon and David are getting hitched at FPC Elizabethton tomorrow afternoon!
It isn't technically a marriage as Tennessee is, believe it or not, a bit behind the times. But as Alan, Esq. pointed out, even if say Landon and David got hitched by me in Washington D.C. it wouldn't be marriage like my marriage to my Lovely because their D.C. marriage wouldn't count in Tennessee. Even marriage in states where marriage is legal still isn't really marriage the way heteros enjoy marriage. It is time to make a federal case for marriage equality.
As far as church business goes, get your pens ready teaching elders and sign those licenses, eat that cake, pray over those rings, repeat those vows, and show the love and justice of Jesus for Christ's sake.
I stand with you!
We are Spartacus. Thanks to Snad for this clip!
Old movies make me cry.
Especially this one, "I'm Brian! And so is my wife!"
She was taken to church court for getting legally married. The busybodies said that is bad, against the Bible, and so on. The presbytery pjc said it was fine. She was acquitted. The busybodies appealed. How does that happen, by the way? I'm no lawyer but isn't that double jeopardy? I guess with church court we should be lucky they don't determine justice by filling our pockets with rocks and throwing us in the water to see if we float.
Anyway, the synod pjc said not guilty. The busybodies decided to keep trying and now she is before the General Assembly PJC. We will find out next week.
In the meantime, Laurie and Lisa have already been married for three years.
In the meantime, it is time for all good clergy to obey their ordination vows and sign this statement that you have and/or will marry same-gender couples and not only to sign the statement, but if given the opportunity, seize the day!
In the meantime, Landon and David are getting hitched at FPC Elizabethton tomorrow afternoon!
It isn't technically a marriage as Tennessee is, believe it or not, a bit behind the times. But as Alan, Esq. pointed out, even if say Landon and David got hitched by me in Washington D.C. it wouldn't be marriage like my marriage to my Lovely because their D.C. marriage wouldn't count in Tennessee. Even marriage in states where marriage is legal still isn't really marriage the way heteros enjoy marriage. It is time to make a federal case for marriage equality.
As far as church business goes, get your pens ready teaching elders and sign those licenses, eat that cake, pray over those rings, repeat those vows, and show the love and justice of Jesus for Christ's sake.
I stand with you!
We are Spartacus. Thanks to Snad for this clip!
Old movies make me cry.
Especially this one, "I'm Brian! And so is my wife!"
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Narrative
Saturday was a hard day. There are many hard days to come. I wonder how long it will take for me to create my own meaning from this. Grief experts say I need a narrative. I suppose I have been trained for that task. I am after all, a "religious professional." One of my working definitions of religion is to create meaning out of a meaningless existence. We are storytellers and narrative-makers. We come from a long line of them.
Lawrence Krauss tells us that universes pop in and out of existence without any supernatural shenanigans. We live and move and have our being in one of those "pops." What does that mean? The author of Genesis took a crack at it, "When God began creating..." as did the author of the Gospel of John, "In the beginning was the Word...." I suppose for some Genesis and John still work well. At times even for me. I am giving it a college try to create my own narrative of meaning in a Krauss Universe. You can find it in the pages of this blog and in my Sunday sermons. It isn't much, but it's mine.
Religion tries to make sense of out of senseless tragedy and violence. The Romans tortured and executed thousands of rebels and undesirables by public crucifixion as a warning and as demonstration of power. One of these poor wretches is named, has stories attached to him, and is turned into a god. His death saves the world from sin. His resurrection brings believers to eternal life. That is quite a narrative. It was a narrative compelling enough to create Christendom. It works for some. At times, even for me. I am giving it a college try to create my own narrative of the meaning of Jesus. You can find it in the pages of this blog and in my Sunday sermons. It isn't much, but it's mine.
I admit that I am better at deconstructing than constructing. I am better at poking holes in narratives than in creating them. But my personal task now is to construct. So what is the narrative for the life and death of my beautiful boy? It won't be much but it will be mine. Hopefully, it will be a narrative that will help me to carry on, to forget myself in laughter more often than not, to get lost in a sunset, to grow old a little wiser, to grow closer to my Lovely and my daughter, to own my sad feelings and to weep through them, to discover a deeper sense of compassion, to live life as fully as I can, and to live it for my son and for me. I want my narrative of Zach to help me do that.
It will have to include the story of the time he called us into the bathroom. He was maybe two or three. He was sitting on the toilet, bent over with the seat cover on his back. He laughed and said he was a teenage mutant ninja turtle. Any narrative of my Zach will include a story of him racing down the street in his Big Wheel wearing his cowboy boots. It will include him standing proudly with me and greeting parishioners on their way out the door. It will have to include both of us in our Taekwondo uniforms, and playing video games, and skiing at Snow Ridge. Hugs. How do you tell a narrative about Zach hugs? How do you put hugs in words? The way he called me, "Pops." How do I write the way he called me "Pops"?
His heart. His big heart. His big compassionate heart that wouldn't let him hurt a bug. His big heart wouldn't let him stand for meanness or let him see someone bullied without speaking up. His big heart and his mind knew pain. He felt pain, excruciating, senseless, meaningless pain that he couldn't share, that I couldn't take from him, that I couldn't reach. I don't know how to tell that story, not now, not yet, but someday I may be able to tell of his courageous and lonely struggle. I may never grasp this meaninglessness, but I will tell his story--my story of Zach. He gave us so much joy. Amidst it all, he gave us joy. I will keep him in my heart, always.
Tuesday, October 09, 2012
Showing the Love and Justice of Jesus Christ
I met with my board of elders or session last night. Among the various items for business we discussed the Stand For Love initiative from More Light Presbyterians. I previously wrote that I signed this statement:
As of this writing I am one of 195 signatories. Some of this is a problem with semantics as we discussed at the meeting last night. What is marriage? Is it a legal document? Is it a religious action? Is it a personal agreement between people?
When the statement says, "I have married or am willing to publicly marry same gender couples," I do wonder have I done that? I am willing to of course. But have I so far? I have not signed a marriage license for a same-gender couple. I live in Tennessee. It will likely take federal troops for this state to accept marriage equality. If I were invited to sign the license and bless the nuptials for a same-gender couple in New York, I will be happy to do it for the gas money and the thrill and honor of it all. (On second thought, if asked, I would buy my own gas).
I have officiated at Holy Unions for same gender couples. I have one coming up this Saturday. David and Landon have invited the congregation to celebrate with them. You can read about it in the newsletter (page 9). Is it a marriage? Here is our session's policy:
I treat same-gender couples no differently from opposite-gender couples. They go through counseling. We create a worship service that is meaningful. We honor and celebrate and bless the relationship as holy, sacred and blessed. I use all the ordained Presbyterian mojo and hoopla I have in me to honor these lives.
So am I breaking the church rules? I really don't know. I do know that my colleagues who sign the license because they happen to live in a state where same-gender marriage is legal are breaking the church rules. I know that because of the precedent set by the Jane Spahr case. If you have not listened to my Religion For Life interview with Jane Spahr, I invite you to do that. Here is the podcast. She describes all the church disciplinary shenanigans in regards to her case, but more importantly she talks about why marriage equality is so critical:
The General Assembly could have avoided this by issuing an Authoritative Interpretation that would have allowed clergy and churches to marry same-gender couples in states where it is legal to do so. The General Assembly did not do this. Therefore, because my colleagues are at risk of church discipline, including ultimately losing their ordination, this action, Stand For Love, is now necessary. I proudly stand with my colleagues in their obedience to their ordination vows as I seek to obey mine.
As a teaching elder in the PCUSA, I have married or am willing to publicly marry same gender couples in my pastoral role, in obedience to my ordination vow to “show the love and justice of Jesus Christ.” Respecting the conscience of fellow Presbyterians, I accept the consequences of this declaration, including the provisions of discipline in our Book of Order.
As of this writing I am one of 195 signatories. Some of this is a problem with semantics as we discussed at the meeting last night. What is marriage? Is it a legal document? Is it a religious action? Is it a personal agreement between people?
When the statement says, "I have married or am willing to publicly marry same gender couples," I do wonder have I done that? I am willing to of course. But have I so far? I have not signed a marriage license for a same-gender couple. I live in Tennessee. It will likely take federal troops for this state to accept marriage equality. If I were invited to sign the license and bless the nuptials for a same-gender couple in New York, I will be happy to do it for the gas money and the thrill and honor of it all. (On second thought, if asked, I would buy my own gas).
I have officiated at Holy Unions for same gender couples. I have one coming up this Saturday. David and Landon have invited the congregation to celebrate with them. You can read about it in the newsletter (page 9). Is it a marriage? Here is our session's policy:
Do you marry same-sex couples?Our policy is based on the legal definition of marriage. So from that perspective, this Saturday's wedding is not a marriage. Yet what we will do on Saturday will be no different from what we would do if we lived in New York State, except for signing the license. They will be married in the sacred sense of the word.
No. Tennessee restricts marriage to one man and one woman. However, we do celebrate Holy Union ceremonies for same-sex couples and for opposite-sex couples who do not wish to be married.
I treat same-gender couples no differently from opposite-gender couples. They go through counseling. We create a worship service that is meaningful. We honor and celebrate and bless the relationship as holy, sacred and blessed. I use all the ordained Presbyterian mojo and hoopla I have in me to honor these lives.
So am I breaking the church rules? I really don't know. I do know that my colleagues who sign the license because they happen to live in a state where same-gender marriage is legal are breaking the church rules. I know that because of the precedent set by the Jane Spahr case. If you have not listened to my Religion For Life interview with Jane Spahr, I invite you to do that. Here is the podcast. She describes all the church disciplinary shenanigans in regards to her case, but more importantly she talks about why marriage equality is so critical:
Second class status always leads to violence.Churches and clergy because of the moral symbolism attached to them need to demonstrate in word and in deed that same-gender relationships are moral, ethical, and sacred. If doing so requires personal risk, then we need to ask ourselves what it means to "show the love and justice of Jesus Christ" in the first place.
The General Assembly could have avoided this by issuing an Authoritative Interpretation that would have allowed clergy and churches to marry same-gender couples in states where it is legal to do so. The General Assembly did not do this. Therefore, because my colleagues are at risk of church discipline, including ultimately losing their ordination, this action, Stand For Love, is now necessary. I proudly stand with my colleagues in their obedience to their ordination vows as I seek to obey mine.
Monday, October 08, 2012
Lawrence Krauss, A Universe From Nothing, October 11-15 on Religion For Life!
Physicist Lawrence Krauss talks about his new book, A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing on Religion For Life. The book arose from the response to this Youtube lecture that has received over a million and one half views. He describes the universe without any recourse to "supernatural shenanigans." Join us for a fascinating and lively conversation about the universe as science reveals it!
Listen via livestream…
Thursday, October 11th at 8 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Sunday, October 14th at noon on WEHC, 90.7.
Sunday, October 14th at 2 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Monday, October 15th at 1 pm on WEHC, 90.7.
Via podcast beginning October 16th.
Listen via livestream…
Thursday, October 11th at 8 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Sunday, October 14th at noon on WEHC, 90.7.
Sunday, October 14th at 2 pm on WETS, 89.5.
Monday, October 15th at 1 pm on WEHC, 90.7.
Via podcast beginning October 16th.
Labels:
cosmology,
lawrence krauss,
religion for life,
science
Meaning of Life, Part 78
We live in a world that doesn't like pain. We too might be tempted to turn from it, to keep the stiff upper lip. But grief asks us to touch pain, to sit with pain and to ask it to tea.
Being with your sorrow is brave. It is counter culture courage. Not only is there nothing wrong with you for feeling your pain, know that it takes strength to venture into this frightening territory.
~Ashley Davis Bush
Labels:
grief,
Meaning of Life,
via negativa,
zach
Sunday, October 07, 2012
Becoming Wholehearted--A Sermon
We celebrated communion as part of World Communion Sunday. We had special guest musicians, kRi and Hettie. They sang three songs that fit right in with the service, including You Matter to Me that I found on youtube.
I order worship along the four paths of Creation Spirituality. A path for each season of the year. These paths have been described by theologian Matthew Fox in his book, Original Blessing. Fox was formerly a Roman Catholic priest, but because of his views he was silenced by the Vatican. He is now an Episcopal priest. Fox challenged some traditional doctrines such as original sin. He suggested that we might instead embrace original blessing.
He also wrote about the spiritual journey in a different way. Rather than Fall, Repentance, Reunion, which is the common three-fold path of traditional Christianity, he saw the experience of life as more nuanced and complex. He articulated a stream that was present but underground throughout the Christian tradition. Known as Creation Spirituality, this way of seeing the universe, God and ourselves affirms creation not as fallen but as wonderful and awe-filled.
The spiritual path of embracing creation in its wild beauty is the via positiva, or way of awe and wonder. Fox is a Roman Catholic so he knows his Latin. Via means path. The way of "wowing" at this amazing and expanding universe is a path to the Sacred.
Three other paths are the via creativa, the way of creativity. We are creative beings, making all kinds of things, wonderful things, and destructive things. We are generative and creative. All of us. That is a path to the Sacred.
Another path is the via transformativa, or the way compassion and justice-making. This is the way of channeling our creativity toward the good, toward wholeness, toward peace and well-being for all creation. This is the path of the activist and the prophet within us. This also is a path to the Sacred.
The path that we are exploring during the season of Autumn as the leaves change color and fall, is the via negativa, the way of letting go and letting be.
These four paths are ways of dancing with the Sacred. We move in and out of them. Not a ladder climbed, but a spiral danced, says Matthew Fox.
This via negativa is trickier than the others in some respects. It is sometimes equated with sin and suffering. But that isn’t quite correct.
The via negativa or the spiritual path of letting go and letting be is a spiritual path.
I emphasize path.
It is a way to the Sacred.
The via negativa isn’t to be equated with suffering, tragedy, or moral evil.
It is possible, however, that those experiences can present a path through which we receive grace, touch the holy, discover the sacred, and find our heart.
It is a path in which the traveler refuses to be defined by experiences or events but finds the heart to face, reflect and walk through these experiences to an unknown future.
The word heart comes from the Latin cor from which we get the word courage. If we are lucky in life we will meet courageous, big-hearted, whole-hearted people. If we are blessed in life we will be inspired by them to find our own heart.
If you want to know where to find these people,
I would say look to your left and right.
Look in front of you and look behind you.
Go ahead.
Take a moment right now and look around
and see big-hearted people in your midst.
From my vantage point I see the faces of wholehearted people who have found the heart to move through a difficult experience and grow from it.
That courageous big-hearted, wholehearted person is your neighbor.
That courageous big-hearted, wholehearted person is you.
Somewhere along life’s path,
you found the courage whether or not you called it that
and you found the heart,
to move through a challenging experience.
It may have been with fits and starts.
It may have been with pain and bleeding.
You may have the scars to show for it.
On that path,
you found within yourself a previously untapped skill,
gift, virtue, or strength of character.
Somewhere along life’s path, you had to let go of some image of yourself. A piece of armor or protection was removed and you saw yourself vulnerable and exposed. While painful and frightening that you is of great worth and deserves great love.
That is the sacred.
That is the holy.
That is the pearl as in Jesus’ parable:
“Selling everything he owns” is a metaphor for letting go.
The pearl is you.
It is your sacred self.
The via negativa is letting go of what we are supposed to be so we can embrace who we are.
"Let Go of Who You Think You are Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are" is the subtitle of a book by Dr. Brene Brown. The title is The Gifts of Imperfection. She writes about wholehearted living:
The ancient wisdom for that is found in the words of Jesus when he was asked,
Jesus says:
Now we can fight with each other over the meaning of “God” and who worships the right “God” or which religion worships “God” right. I don’t think Jesus was worried about that. You can define God how you need to do it.
I say with serious jest that we are a BYOG church. Bring Your Own God.
According to the via negativa you will be wrong. As are we all.
The via negativa in regards to God is the path of saying everything we can about God and then saying,
A healthy via negativa in regards to God
So we love this God whom we cannot name
with our whole heart, says Jesus,
and with our soul,
and our mind
and our strength.
Love life, love the universe, love all.
Then Jesus says, "Love your neighbor as yourself."
It is all together.
Neighbor, self, God.
Do you want to know how to love God?
Love your neighbor.
How do you do that?
Love yourself.
Who is yourself?
That is where the via negativa comes in.
All those images we think we are.
Those images we have inherited from culture, parents, religion.
All of those ideals.
All of those expectations.
All of those “shoulds” and “supposed tos.”
Something deeper.
Something more beautiful.
Something more tender.
Something more holy.
A pearl.
A treasure.
That is you.
That is also your neighbor.
When we can discover the fleeting grace to connect at that level,
we experience what Jesus called the kingdom of God.
Communion is a symbol for that.
On World Communion Sunday,
we dare to hope,
we dare to live the reality that such a kingdom is possible.
Amen.
Becoming Wholehearted
John Shuck
First Presbyterian Church
Elizabethton, Tennessee
October 7, 2012
World Communion Sunday
Mark 12:28-34
And one of the scholars approached when he heard them arguing, and because he saw how skillfully Jesus answered them, he asked him, “Of all the commandments, which is the most important?”
Jesus answered,
“The first is, ‘Hear, Israel, the Lord your God is one Lord, and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your mind and all your strength.’
The second is this:
‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’
There is no other commandment greater than these.”
I order worship along the four paths of Creation Spirituality. A path for each season of the year. These paths have been described by theologian Matthew Fox in his book, Original Blessing. Fox was formerly a Roman Catholic priest, but because of his views he was silenced by the Vatican. He is now an Episcopal priest. Fox challenged some traditional doctrines such as original sin. He suggested that we might instead embrace original blessing.
He also wrote about the spiritual journey in a different way. Rather than Fall, Repentance, Reunion, which is the common three-fold path of traditional Christianity, he saw the experience of life as more nuanced and complex. He articulated a stream that was present but underground throughout the Christian tradition. Known as Creation Spirituality, this way of seeing the universe, God and ourselves affirms creation not as fallen but as wonderful and awe-filled.
The spiritual path of embracing creation in its wild beauty is the via positiva, or way of awe and wonder. Fox is a Roman Catholic so he knows his Latin. Via means path. The way of "wowing" at this amazing and expanding universe is a path to the Sacred.
Three other paths are the via creativa, the way of creativity. We are creative beings, making all kinds of things, wonderful things, and destructive things. We are generative and creative. All of us. That is a path to the Sacred.
Another path is the via transformativa, or the way compassion and justice-making. This is the way of channeling our creativity toward the good, toward wholeness, toward peace and well-being for all creation. This is the path of the activist and the prophet within us. This also is a path to the Sacred.
The path that we are exploring during the season of Autumn as the leaves change color and fall, is the via negativa, the way of letting go and letting be.
These four paths are ways of dancing with the Sacred. We move in and out of them. Not a ladder climbed, but a spiral danced, says Matthew Fox.
This via negativa is trickier than the others in some respects. It is sometimes equated with sin and suffering. But that isn’t quite correct.
The via negativa or the spiritual path of letting go and letting be is a spiritual path.
I emphasize path.
It is a way to the Sacred.
The via negativa isn’t to be equated with suffering, tragedy, or moral evil.
It is possible, however, that those experiences can present a path through which we receive grace, touch the holy, discover the sacred, and find our heart.
It is a path in which the traveler refuses to be defined by experiences or events but finds the heart to face, reflect and walk through these experiences to an unknown future.
The word heart comes from the Latin cor from which we get the word courage. If we are lucky in life we will meet courageous, big-hearted, whole-hearted people. If we are blessed in life we will be inspired by them to find our own heart.
If you want to know where to find these people,
I would say look to your left and right.
Look in front of you and look behind you.
Go ahead.
Take a moment right now and look around
and see big-hearted people in your midst.
From my vantage point I see the faces of wholehearted people who have found the heart to move through a difficult experience and grow from it.
That courageous big-hearted, wholehearted person is your neighbor.
That courageous big-hearted, wholehearted person is you.
Somewhere along life’s path,
you found the courage whether or not you called it that
and you found the heart,
to move through a challenging experience.
It may have been with fits and starts.
It may have been with pain and bleeding.
You may have the scars to show for it.
On that path,
you found within yourself a previously untapped skill,
gift, virtue, or strength of character.
Somewhere along life’s path, you had to let go of some image of yourself. A piece of armor or protection was removed and you saw yourself vulnerable and exposed. While painful and frightening that you is of great worth and deserves great love.
That is the sacred.
That is the holy.
That is the pearl as in Jesus’ parable:
The kingdom of heaven is like some merchant looking for beautiful pearls. When he finds one priceless pearl, he sells everything he owns and buys it. Matthew 13:45-46
“Selling everything he owns” is a metaphor for letting go.
The pearl is you.
It is your sacred self.
The via negativa is letting go of what we are supposed to be so we can embrace who we are.
"Let Go of Who You Think You are Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are" is the subtitle of a book by Dr. Brene Brown. The title is The Gifts of Imperfection. She writes about wholehearted living:
Wholehearted living is about engaging in our lives from a place of worthiness. It means cultivating the courage, compassion, and connection to wake up in the morning and think, No matter what gets done and how much is left undone, I am enough. It is going to bed at night thinking, Yes, I am imperfect and vulnerable and sometimes afraid, but that doesn’t change the truth that I am also brave and worthy of love and belonging. P. 1
The ancient wisdom for that is found in the words of Jesus when he was asked,
“What is the greatest commandment?”
What is all about, Jesus?
What is the main thing we should know to make it through this life?
What is the answer?
Jesus says:
“The first is, ‘Hear, Israel, the Lord your God is one Lord, and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your mind and all your strength.’
The second is this:
‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’
Now we can fight with each other over the meaning of “God” and who worships the right “God” or which religion worships “God” right. I don’t think Jesus was worried about that. You can define God how you need to do it.
I say with serious jest that we are a BYOG church. Bring Your Own God.
According to the via negativa you will be wrong. As are we all.
The via negativa in regards to God is the path of saying everything we can about God and then saying,
"God is not that."
A healthy via negativa in regards to God
- allows you distance when others try to force their idea of God onto you and
- it keeps you from clinging to your favorite image of God as if that image is the real thing.
So we love this God whom we cannot name
with our whole heart, says Jesus,
and with our soul,
and our mind
and our strength.
Love life, love the universe, love all.
Then Jesus says, "Love your neighbor as yourself."
It is all together.
Neighbor, self, God.
Do you want to know how to love God?
Love your neighbor.
How do you do that?
Love yourself.
Who is yourself?
That is where the via negativa comes in.
All those images we think we are.
Those images we have inherited from culture, parents, religion.
All of those ideals.
All of those expectations.
All of those “shoulds” and “supposed tos.”
Not that.
Something deeper.
Something more beautiful.
Something more tender.
Something more holy.
A pearl.
A treasure.
That is you.
That is also your neighbor.
When we can discover the fleeting grace to connect at that level,
we experience what Jesus called the kingdom of God.
Communion is a symbol for that.
On World Communion Sunday,
we dare to hope,
we dare to live the reality that such a kingdom is possible.
Amen.
Labels:
fall 2012,
kRi and Hettie,
sermon,
via negativa
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)