Here is something timely:
1,270 Architects/Engineers Reveal Hard Evidence of Explosive Demolition at World Trade Center on 9/11
Former US Senator Mike Gravel (D-AK) and Richard Gage, AIA, Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Discuss Scientific Findings
National Press Club, Washington DC, 2:00 pm, Thursday, September 9, 2010
WASHINGTON, Sept. 7 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Thursday September 9, 2010, Gravel and Gage will host a central press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC, presenting hard evidence that all three WTC skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, in NYC were destroyed by explosive controlled demolition.
Senator Gravel notes, "Critically important evidence has come forward after the original government building reports were completed."
This press conference will be webcast at AE911Truth.org and hosted concurrently in cities throughout the world.* Following the conference, there will be a mock debate during which public statements made by government investigators and other defenders of the official account will be presented and responded to in multimedia format. "They refuse to debate us in person," says Gage, "so we will let their public statements represent them."
Gage will release a media-friendly summary of his organization's findings, which are based on forensic evidence as well as video and eyewitness testimony that were omitted from official reports. He will show evidence that the WTC Twin Towers were not destroyed by jet plane impacts or fires, but by pre-set explosives and incendiaries. The non-profit organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, will also call for a grand jury investigation of government report lead engineers Shyam Sunder and John Gross of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. "They were in a position to know the evidence we have been presenting," says Gage. [Read More]
1,270. That is a lot of architects and engineers.
Maybe you would like to sign the petition "demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation." I did.
I wonder if any of these folks has ever seen a controlled demolition on say, one of those cool Discovery channel shows.
ReplyDeleteThe amount of planning, equipment and explosives required to do a controlled demolition could not possibly go unnoticed. Contrary to what people see in the movies, it does not involve just a couple slabs of C4 and a cell phone. Heck, even a simple fireworks show takes enough planning and equipment that it could not go unnoticed by people.
As for 1270. I can get 1270 people to believe anything I want. The class I'm teaching this semester has 1400 students and I can make them do jumping jacks in bunny suits on the Diag if I want and they'd be happy to do it if they thought it would increase their grade.
I guess that these 1270 are being told what to believe so they can increase their grade. That's the conspiracy. : )
ReplyDeleteThe problem with these groups is not the out-front message they are conveying, it's that the elephant in the room will finally be unveiled when they announce "The Gov'ment did it!"
ReplyDeleteMuch like the "we didn't go to the moon" folks, that's where they lose credibility. Not that the facts aren't the facts, but that it's all a big government conspiracy.
Any attempt to debate with them will just bring out accusations that "you're just working for them".
My point is that people can be led to believe almost anything. Especially a tiny number of people like 1270 self-selected folks.
ReplyDeleteMy point is that people can be led to believe almost anything.
ReplyDeleteThat's the truth.
I don't think you are working for "them" Baywolfe.
ReplyDeleteI am expressing dissatisfaction with the official account of the events of 9/11 as expressed in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Baywolfe - why is it so difficult to believe a government can do something so cynical and sinister? Our own government has done much worse. After all, anyone who still believes that dropping TWO nuclear bombs on Japanese civilians was necessary to achieve victory in WWII should count themselves among Alan's 1270!
ReplyDeleteAnd how many engineers and physicists have looked at the evidence and said that there was enough energy in the speed of the plane, the jet fuel, the paper in the building AND the melting of steel trusses around the crash site to cause the collapse of the buildings? I understand that 1270 is a very small minority. Are all the other engineers and physicists in on the conspiracy too?
ReplyDeleteAlan, if my chemistry teacher had offered me an A for doing jumping jacks in a bunny suit I would have said when and where? I never got the math of combining atoms into molecules and thereby sharing electrons. Which is one of the reasons I have admitted that I am far outside my field and need to depend on experts.
And yes the majority of experts can be wrong. But there are other times when they are right. The evidence is there that proves they are right. Kind of like with evolution.
Oh and I do believe that governments can be cynical and sinister. Just look at the 1876 election that put a Republican in office for ending Reconstruction. So the Republicans sold out African Americans for one term in the presidency? Kind of short sighted yes? Kind of human and stupid.
ReplyDeleteAnd how many engineers and physicists have looked at the evidence and said that there was enough energy in the speed of the plane, the jet fuel, the paper in the building AND the melting of steel trusses around the crash site to cause the collapse of the buildings?
ReplyDeleteI don't know. Do you know? Is there a list of architects and engineers who have signed a statement agreeing with what you stated?
I understand that 1270 is a very small minority. Are all the other engineers and physicists in on the conspiracy too?
No. Snark? It will be interesting to see what this group comes up with. It is unfortunate that the debris at the crime scene was removed before it had a chance to be analyzed.
Tower 7 is curious. A 47 story building collapsed later in the afternoon. The 911 Commission report didn't think that incident was worth a mention.
Here is an interesting article that I found on Paul Thompson's website (which is really fun by the way. I wish I had my blog that well organized)!
ReplyDelete